101. Fitness Assessment, Exercise Training, and Performance of Athletes and Healthy People - fitness assessment of healthy people Scientific Abstract

3203 - Body Composition And Somatotype By Sex In Candidates That Apply To Dance And Theater University Degrees.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine and to compare the body composition and somatotype profiles with anthropometric methods by sex in Mexican candidates that apply to dance and theater university degrees at the University of Guadalajara.
METHODS: 264 (95 males, 169 females) Mexican candidates that applied to dance and theater university degrees were evaluated anthropometrically by certified staff by the International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK). A complete profile anthropometric evaluation according to ISAK methodology was performed for each subject. We estimated body composition by four compartments according to Kerr equations (adipose, muscle, bone, and visceral tissues), and Somatotype was determined by the Heath and Carter method (decimal equations). The sample was divided by sex. Body composition values (adipose tissue, muscle, bone) and the somatotype components were expressed as mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum. T-test for independent samples was performed to compare variables by sex.
RESULTS: Subject’s age, weight, height, and body mass index were: 19 ± 3 and 19 ± 2 years, 67 ± 13 and 57 ± 12 kg; 172 ± 8 and 160 ± 6 cm; and 22 ± 4 and 22 ± 4 kg/m2, for males and females, respectively. There were significant differences in all three compartments between males and females (percentage and mass). In the case of somatotype, we found that values of Endomorphy were lower and values of Ectomorphy were higher in males than females. Values of Mesomorphy were similar among sex. The mean value for males was Central (4-4-3), while in females was Mesomorphic Endomorph (5-4-2).
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found that body composition, as well as somatotype, differs by sex. However, the sample was not divided by performing art (dance and theater), being able to find either similarities or differences with the existing literature.
Table 1. Body composition and somatotype profile of the evaluated subjects
VariableTotal (n=264)Males (n=95)Females (n=169)p-value
Adipose tissue (%)27 ± 7.4 (8-40)20 ± 5.7 (8-32)31 ± 4.4 (19-40)<0.001
Adipose tissue (kg)16 ± 6.2 (3-36)14 ± 6.2 (3-32)18 ± 5.7 (7-36)<0.001
Muscle mass (%)35 ± 5.1 (25-50)40 ± 4.6 (29-50)33 ± 3.4 (25-41)<0.001
Muscle mass (kg)21 ± 5.4 (13-43)26 ± 4.5 (16-43)18 ± 3.5 (13-40)<0.001
Bone mass (%)16 ± 2.1 (10-23)17 ± 2.3 (10-23)15 ± 1.8 (10-20)<0.001
Bone mass (kg)9 ± 1.7 (7-15)11 ± 1.5 (7-15)9 ± 1.1 (7-12)<0.001
Endomorphy4 ± 1.6 (1-8)4 ± 1.5 (1-8)5 ± 1.4 (2-8)<0.001
Mesomorphy4 ± 1.4 (1-11)4 ± 1.3 (1-9)4 ± 1.4 (1-11)1.000
Ectomorphy2 ± 1.4 (0-8)3 ± 1.5 (0-8)2 ± 1.4 (0-6)<0.001
Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation (min-max)
Collapse